Once in a while, a movie is made that affects social consciousness and creates a conduit for important change in one’s self, in one’s country. As Robert Kennedy once said: “Each time a man stands up for an ideal, or acts to improve the lot of others, or strikes out against injustice, he sends forth a tiny ripple of hope and crossing each other from a million different centers of energy and daring, those ripples build a current that can sweep down the mightiest walls of oppression and resistance.”

“Deadline” is one of these movies. The movie is inspired by Mark Ethridge’s 2006 book, Grievances, which detailed his reporting for the Charlotte (N.C.) Observer about an unsolved murder of a young African-American in a small South Carolina town. Ethridge also wrote the screenplay for “Deadline” and moved the story from North Carolina to present day Alabama and Nashville.

Directed by Nashville’s Curt Hahn, “Deadline” offers an excellent depiction of the segregated, racist South. It is a murder mystery of the highest sort. The kind that niggles at you in a relentless way and makes you long to know the truth. And even though the core of this story takes place long ago, it brings a new awareness to current hostilities and racist secrets of towns haunted by their past.

“Deadline” focuses on a small town in Alabama with big secrets. Those big secrets cover up the murder of an African-American youth in rural Alabama that has gone unsolved for almost 20 years. In fact, the murder was never really investigated, much less solved. But Matt Harper, (Steve Talley) who is a reporter for the Nashville Times, meets Trey Hall, (Lauren Jenkins), a conscientious rich girl from Alabama who wants to uncover the truth about the murder since their housekeeper, Mary Pell Sampson (Nashville’s Jackie Welch) is the mother of the slain boy, Wallace Sampson (Romonte Hamer).  Despite objections from the Nashville Times publisher, Harper undertakes the investigation and works with his scraggly colleague Ronnie Bullock (Oscar nominee Eric Roberts) to uncover the truth. Along the way, there are violent threats from folks in Alabama who don’t want the story to be told, problems with Harper’s fiancé, Delana Calhoun (Anna Felix) and Harper’s father’s impending death from cancer. Harper’s father, Lucas Harper, is played by J.D. Souther who is a singer/songwriter and was a lyricist for the Eagles.

As for the actors, they are all…well, remarkable. Jackie Welch gives a solid, strong performance as Mary Pell, the elderly woman who harbors one of the biggest secrets of all. Never overly wrought, she displays a calm strength that carries her life’s burdens and heartbreaking pain.

Steve Talley, as the young handsome Matt Harper, is infectious, believable and likeable on the big screen. I predict we’ll see much bigger things from him in the future.

J.D. Souther who plays Lucas Harper, Matt’s father, is stellar in his performance of a dying man with cancer. The story between Matt and his father is actually based on the real-life relationship Ethridge had with his own father, the legendary Louisville Courier-Journal editor, Mark F. Ethridge.

Romonte Hamer, who plays Wallace Sampson in the prologue of the movie, is new to the big screen and is sweet, handsome, poetic, and destined to become a star.

All the actors give outstanding performances and are a credit to this small, indie film.

In a nutshell, “Deadline” aptly portrays the South and all its faults, but it also highlights the South’s ability to rise above its faults and come together in the spirit of justice and humanity. It is a movie about journalistic integrity and the importance of the free press in a world where free speech is not always upheld. It is a movie that has a consciousness – sadly, something that many movies ignore these days.

“Auteur” theory holds that a director’s films reflect personal creative vision as if he or she were the primary “Auteur,” meaning author. From the earliest silent films to contemporary times, motion pictures have crossed over and both entertained and educated the viewing audience. “Deadline” is this kind of movie. Produced by Transcendent, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Nashville’s Film House, it provides a social conduit reflecting and commenting about society and the times. Transcendent produces independent features and inspiring, uplifting films that “speak to the viewer’s heart” and are often overlooked by Hollywood. Since this is an independent film, money has been tight and director Curt Hahn (and head of Transcendent film productions) and Ethridge are launching rolling premieres and partnering with newspapers in markets across the South. Themovie had its first premiere in Nashville on Wednesday in conjunction with The Tennessean, which allowed the movie to be filmed in its newsroom. More than 1,000 people attended the premiere in Nashville this past week, raising $13,000 for Family & Children’s Service.

Before the movie opens nationally on April 13, Hahn and Ethridge will board a bus to crisscross the South, hitting premieres in cities like Memphis, Tennessee; Naples and Tampla, Florida; Dallas, Texas; Atlanta, Georgia; and Columbia, S.C. If the bus rolls into your city, be sure and support this film by going out to see it. You won’t regret it, I promise you.

Whatever you do – wherever you are - do not miss this film. It kept me on the edge of my seat the whole time.  I loved it and you will, too. In fact, the snow has stopped in Nashville and I think I’ll go and see it a second time today.  Everyone, I hope to see you there! I’ll save you a seat!

This movie is my favorite of all the Twilight movies with the exception of the first one. Directed by Catherine Hardwicke, the first movie, Twilight, set the stage for the romance and longing that would be thematic through each succeeding movie. Breaking Dawn, Part 1 continued the same feeling of romance and timelessness that the first one invoked. I also liked the first and last books of the Twilight series the best. In the first book (and movie), Bella and Edward meet and fall in love. There is nothing like that moment of falling in love and that first book and movie captured this. And in the last book (and movie), they consummate their relationship and love with a fantasy wedding and “ever after.”

Bill Condon (Dream Girls, Gods and Monsters) directed Breaking Dawn, Part 1 and Melissa Rosenberg wrote the script, as she has for all the Twilight films. They did a masterful, beautiful job and stayed true to author Stephenie Meyer’s vision. If you haven’t read the books, then you’re missing a lot. Yes, you can still enjoy the movies, but you’re going to miss the intricacies that make a story great. Like other books (Harry Potter, The Hunger Games, etc.) the Twilight books are complicated and in-depth. But that’s what makes them so great. They are full of heart. They appeal to girls and boys of all ages because they’re about love. (Boys will deny that they love the books, but many do). The Twilight story is about meeting someone you love so intensely, you know you cannot live without them. It’s an idealized love, sure, but it’s one that all of us long for. It’s the “Cinderella” story of the 21^st century. It’s intoxicating.

This review will contain spoilers. Most of you have read the books, so you already know what to expect in the movie. And most diehard fans probably saw the movie during its opening weekend of November 18^th, so as you read this, you will understand what I’m thinking, what I’m saying.

One thing I noticed in the movie: all the actors have matured in the 4 years since Twilight began and all are more confident, accomplished actors. Which is fitting for the story because Bella and Edward mature in the books. They grow confident in themselves and of their relationship and it’s wonderful to see this reflected in the movie. When we first met Bella (Kristen Stewart) in Twilight, the original 2008 feature, she was a clumsy, quiet, book-nerdish high-school student surviving adolescence in Forks, Washington. Just a few years later, Bella’s not only graduating from high school, she’s walking down the aisle to marry her “Prince Charming,” in this case, vampire Edward Cullen.

The movie opens with the wedding of Bella and Edward and it is the most fairytale, picturesque wedding I’ve ever seen. Set outdoors in the forest with wood-hewn seats and white flowers forming an overhead canopy from the trees, this wedding is stunning in every way. When Bella and Edward have their first kiss as a married couple, Iron & Wine’s “Flightless Bird, American Mouth (wedding version)” soars through the scene, harkening back to the first Twilight movie. It was the same song that played when Bella and Edward had their first dance at the prom. Nothing could have evoked such stirring, emotional feelings of love as this song and moment. We fell in love with Bella and Edward then as a couple and three years later, we’re celebrating that love again.

Bella’s high school friends are at the wedding and Jessica (Anna Kendrick) has her “scene stealing” moments when she says: “I wonder if she’ll be showing,” to her friend Angela. “Why else does anyone get married at 18?”

There is also humor in the film and during the reception, several people give a toast to the newlyweds including Jessica who talks about how everyone had a crush on Edward in high school, but then it became “all about Bella” even though Bella wasn’t the president of anything. Charlie (Billy Burke) who plays Bella’s father gave one of the funniest toasts, proclaiming, “I am a cop and I know things. I know how to hunt people down….” I would have liked to have seen a few more scenes with Bella and her father because that was one of the highlights of all the films. When she talks to him while on her honeymoon and he says, “So, I guess Edward still walks on water,” I thought it was great. Bella’s mom, Renee (Sarah Clarke) is hilarious as she sings a lullaby to Bella as her way of “toasting” her. It’s really funny. Stephenie Meyer was among the guests at the wedding, as was Melissa Rosenberg. I thought this was a fun nod to them and to Twilight fans as well.

Jacob (Taylor Lautner) surprises Bella at the wedding reception and Bella feels complete. It is only when she tells him that she plans to have a traditional honeymoon while still human that Jacob loses it and has to be escorted off the property by his wolf-pack brothers. All through the movie, we see Jacob mature as well as he comes to a new understanding of the Cullen family. At one point, he says: “I can see that you all are a real family, just as much as the family I was born into.”

Bella and Edward leave on their honeymoon and go to Rio de Janeiro and dance in the streets, then boat on to Isle Esme, a gift from Carlisle and Esme. Their honeymoon night is fraught with nerves and tension, but a moonlight swim helps to ease the stress of “the first time” for both of them. And Edward tells her: “I promised you we’ll try.” It was romantic and perfect. And it was Stewart’s and Pattinson’s strongest performances to date. You can feel Bella’s hunger and desire for Edward. You can feel the love between the two. One of the best moments is “the morning after” when Bella is reliving her night with Edward, remembering moments….a kiss….a touch…his lips…It’s the way we all remember the first time, I believe. We relish in the memories the day after and this was conveyed so beautifully in the movie.

After the first night, he tries to distract her from “the marriage bed” because his strength is almost too much for her and she has the bruises to show this. And he can’t stand the thought of hurting her. And, he wrecked the bedroom, tearing down the canopy around the bed, the bed frame, the window frame and more. It was comical and added humor to the moment.  She tries to seduce him during the rest of the honeymoon, parading in front of him in a black nightie that Alice (Ashley Green) packed for her. He laughs and turns away.

The movie will be wonderful for all young girls who are anticipating their “first time” with a guy. It shows the nervousness, the excitement, the beauty and the romance of that first idyllic moment when you have your first sexual experience. It is tastefully done.

Bella discovers that she’s pregnant and the fetus is growing at an alarming rate. Edward wants her to get rid of it because he knows the baby is going to kill her. And even though Bella is going to be turned into a vampire eventually, he worries that she won’t live long enough to birth the baby. Bella is determined that the baby must be brought to term even if it kills her.

The birth and imprinting scenes were very well done and I believe anyone watching it will understand what “imprinting” is. The birth of the hybrid baby is a little gory, I will admit that. But, it stayed true to the book and this was important. (It’s a little girl (Mackenzie Foy, who is beautiful and looks like she could be Stewart’s and Pattinson’s real-life baby) who Bella names Reneesmee after Renee and Esme). And then, when Jacob imprints on the baby, I loved how they showed the baby grown up as a young woman and all the scenes of this young woman running through the fields. (Seems like there could definitely be a sequel to this Twilight series called “Jacob & Reneesmee.” Wouldn’t we all like to see if they get married?)

Bella and Edward return to Forks, Washington where Bella is “sick” and her fetus is growing at an alarming rate. She looks like a refugee from a concentration camp – all bones and stomach. (Rob Pattinson explained on a talk show that they used a computer-generated body that they attached to Stewart’s head to make her look emaciated).

Jacob (Taylor Lautner) learns that Bella is sick and supposedly staying on her honeymoon for an extended time to recover, he visits the Cullen’s house and discovers that not only is Bella sick, but she’s also pregnant with a half-vampire, half-human hybrid who’s destroying her from the inside out. His wolf-pack’s leader Sam (Chaske Spencer) wants him to join their fight to kill Bella and destroy the seemingly dangerous fetus who will “kill them all.” Jacob won’t agree to this and declares his independence from the pack. This scene, done in wolf form with Condon’s other new addition, wolf-pack telepathy, was intense and clearly illustrated how the wolves all communicate psychically with one another. Once Jacob separates from the pack, Seth (Booboo Stewart) and Leah (Julia Jones) join Jacob because they believe it’s the right thing to do

Bella has to resort to drinking blood to give the proper nutrition to the baby. You might think this is gross, but by this time, Bella will try anything because she’s dying. Edward says that animal blood won’t do and Carlisle announces he has some O-negative in stock for Bella. The whole Cullen family is starved for blood because they can’t go out to hunt since the wolf-pack are surrounding their property. The hungry brothers-in-law leave the room so as to not be tempted. Edward has Carlisle put the blood in a white Styrofoam cup to disguise what she’s drinking. But it stains her lips and teeth and looks like the real thing. She says it tastes good though and Carlisle confirms that her blood pressure is already up, proving that the baby does indeed need blood “nutrition.”

In case you haven’t seen the movie, I’m not going to go into the last part of it. I want you to go see it and be surprised. I want you to experience the intensity of the moments of romance, the wedding, the honeymoon, the birth, the liaison between Rosalie (Nikki Reed) and Bella who connive together to save the baby, the problems Jacob has with his wolf-pack brothers, the growth of the characters, the love, the devotion, and so much more.

And the music is wonderful. Carter Burwell scored this movie (as he did for Twilight) and it adds continuity to the first Twilight movie. When Bella “dies,” there is a tie-in to all the other movies that bring it full-circle. But, I’m not going to elaborate on that. Again, I want you to go see it for yourself. And if you haven’t read the books, go get them now. You have no excuse.

I will probably see it several times while it’s in the theater. It is just wonderful.

In Time is written by writer-director Andrew Niccol, who wrote the brilliant The Truman Show.  I liked Nicol’s movie, In Time even though many critics didn’t. The movie which stars Justin Timberlake and Amanda Seyfried takes place in a dystopian future where man is now engineered so that the aging gene automatically stops at 25.  Everybody essentially stops aging at 25 and has a digital clock – glow-in-the-dark-numbers – embedded on their forearm displaying just how long they will live. You can transfer money (that is, time) from someone else’s arm to yours, but when your time is up, you instantly die.  There is no resuscitation, no pounding on the heart to restart it, nothing. You’re dead.

The tricky part in the movie is that after age 25, the length of your life depends on how much time you can beg, borrow, buy or steal. If one is rich, then that person can potentially live forever and never age past 25. In fact, there is no money. Everything is paid “in time.” It is an extremely fascinating concept.

It is a futuristic world that truly does belong to the “young.” I also see this as a commentary on today’s society where youth, the rich, and beauty are worshipped and where the impoverished (the ones living in the ghetto) are carefully controlled by the wealthy class. Overpopulation is avoided because the wealthy – those in power – keep raising the cost of living.

Justin Timberlake plays Will Salas, a young man who lives in the ghettos with his mother, Olivia Wilde who doesn’t actually look like his mother because she stopped aging at 25. Will inherits a fortune “in time” when a wealthy gentleman — who is well over a hundred years old and has decided that that’s more than long enough to live – gives Will his “time” fortune and dies. Will then becomes one of the rich.

However, Will is accused of the wealthy man’s murder and is forced to go into hiding to get away from the “Timekeepers,” a corrupt police force led by Leon Jaegar, play by Cillian Murphy and the Minutemen, a group of middle-aged thugs led by 75-year-old Fortis, played by Alex Pettyfer (who was gorgeous and a good guy in I Am Number Four.)

Will goes to the rich zone, stays in a 4-star hotel that would rival The Four Seasons, buys a very expensive sports car, and meets Sylvia Weis, a rebellious heiress played by Amanda Seyfried, whose father, Philippe Weis (“Mad Men’s” Vincent Kartheiser) is so wealthy that he controls the time balance, which is locked away in a safety vault. Will takes Sylvia Weis hostage, but they eventually become partners in crime – a modern day Bonnie & Clyde or Robin Hood, who steals from the rich and gives to the poor.

Their goal is to change the system. It’s a theme that’s prevalent in today’s society with all the “Occupy” protests taking place around the country.

In Time is shot on location in Los Angeles where the downtown warehouse district substitutes for the ghetto where most people work and live. Beverly Hills, Malibu, etc., represent where the wealthy live. The production team and veteran cinematographer Roger Deakins (True Grit, The Reader) have recreated the areas in dramatic ways to reflect the rich and the poor.

Timberlake does an excellent job in this role. He has a natural onscreen presence that’s believable and likable. The “I’m Bringing Sexy Back” singer is impressive. I think the concept of the movie is brilliant and the acting very good. I would have enjoyed more tender moments between Timberlake and Seyfried. I would have enjoyed some heartfelt scenes that exposed their vulnerabilities more effectively. But all in all, I think the movie was quite excellent.  Definitely go and see it!

In Time is written by writer-director Andrew Niccol, who wrote the brilliant The Truman Show.  I liked Nicol’s movie, In Time even though many critics didn’t. The movie which stars Justin Timberlake and Amanda Seyfried takes place in a dystopian future where man is now engineered so that the aging gene automatically stops at 25.  Everybody essentially stops aging at 25 and has a digital clock – glow-in-the-dark-numbers – embedded on their forearm displaying just how long they will live. You can transfer money (that is, time) from someone else’s arm to yours, but when your time is up, you instantly die.  There is no resuscitation, no pounding on the heart to restart it, nothing. You’re dead.

The tricky part in the movie is that after age 25, the length of your life depends on how much time you can beg, borrow, buy or steal. If one is rich, then that person can potentially live forever and never age past 25. In fact, there is no money. Everything is paid “in time.” It is an extremely fascinating concept.

It is a futuristic world that truly does belong to the “young.” I also see this as a commentary on today’s society where youth, the rich, and beauty are worshipped and where the impoverished (the ones living in the ghetto) are carefully controlled by the wealthy class. Overpopulation is avoided because the wealthy – those in power – keep raising the cost of living.

Justin Timberlake plays Will Salas, a young man who lives in the ghettos with his mother, Olivia Wilde who doesn’t actually look like his mother because she stopped aging at 25. Will inherits a fortune “in time” when a wealthy gentleman — who is well over a hundred years old and has decided that that’s more than long enough to live – gives Will his “time” fortune and dies. Will then becomes one of the rich.

However, Will is accused of the wealthy man’s murder and is forced to go into hiding to get away from the “Timekeepers,” a corrupt police force led by Leon Jaegar, play by Cillian Murphy and the Minutemen, a group of middle-aged thugs led by 75-year-old Fortis, played by Alex Pettyfer (who was gorgeous and a good guy in I Am Number Four.)

Will goes to the rich zone, stays in a 4-star hotel that would rival The Four Seasons, buys a very expensive sports car, and meets Sylvia Weis, a rebellious heiress played by Amanda Seyfried, whose father, Philippe Weis (“Mad Men’s” Vincent Kartheiser) is so wealthy that he controls the time balance, which is locked away in a safety vault. Will takes Sylvia Weis hostage, but they eventually become partners in crime – a modern day Bonnie & Clyde or Robin Hood, who steals from the rich and gives to the poor.

Their goal is to change the system. It’s a theme that’s prevalent in today’s society with all the “Occupy” protests taking place around the country.

In Time is shot on location in Los Angeles where the downtown warehouse district substitutes for the ghetto where most people work and live. Beverly Hills, Malibu, etc., represent where the wealthy live. The production team and veteran cinematographer Roger Deakins (True Grit, The Reader) have recreated the areas in dramatic ways to reflect the rich and the poor.

Timberlake does an excellent job in this role. He has a natural onscreen presence that’s believable and likable. The “I’m Bringing Sexy Back” singer is impressive. I think the concept of the movie is brilliant and the acting very good. I would have enjoyed more tender moments between Timberlake and Seyfried. I would have enjoyed some heartfelt scenes that exposed their vulnerabilities more effectively. But all in all, I think the movie was quite excellent.  Definitely go and see it!

This movie, Scott Pilgrim vs the World is quirky, fun, zany and adorable. I loved it. Yes, it’s a tribute – a lovely ode – to nerdville, the gaming industry and comic book geeks. But, regular “dull” folks can enjoy it, too. Just “youthen-up” and open your mind a little.

The movie is framed as a video game which requires one to think outside the edges of everyday moviemaking and dive into a world where reality and imagination are blurred together. But, it’s also a love story and a story about facing yourself and your demons and coming to grips with life. There are pop culture references galore thrown into the mix, which was pure genius — sitcom laugh tracks which are hilarious, noir references, the “Seinfeld” theme song and so on. Things do go on a bit too long at times and there are some unnecessary repeats, but it is still highly entertaining. And, skinny Michael Cera is perfect in this role as Scott Pilgrim – a rock’n’roll hero in his own mind.

The story is loosely autobiographical and focuses on Bryan Lee O’Malley’s imaginative, artistic musings about a 22-year-old Toronto native whose life lacks ambition until he’s in a fight TO THE DEATH for his girlfriend, Ramona Flowers. He meets her when she Ramona rollerblades into Scott’s dreams, then turns up at a party a few hours later.  In order to win over Ramona’s affections, he must use a skill-set that one can only learn from video games and comic books. Stuck in adolescence, Scott plays in a band named Sex Bom-Omb, goes on dates that consist of playing Dance Dance Revolution and tries to impress girls with his knowledge of Pac-Man history.

Edgar Wright, director of Shaun of the Dead directed this movie and only someone with his zany viewpoint of the world could pull it off.  And a fantastical world it is.

I loved all the hearts bubbling around the screen, the comic-book style comments, and the “Facebook” style voice-over intro of each character. There’s so much to absorb in this movie – all the pop culture nuances and “tongue-in-cheek” references, it’s a wild ride.

In a nutshell: Scott’s dream girl’s name is Ramona (Mary Elizabeth Winstead), and she has seven deadly ex-boyfriends. Scott must fight each “to the death,” with a death earning high scores (as in video games) and a rainstorm of coins, while kisses (with the girl, not the exes) burst into fireworks of floating hearts. You have to see it to appreciate it.

The screenplay, written by the director, Edgar Wright and Michael Bacall (“Manic”), remains true to O’Malley’s six-volume Scott Pilgrim graphic novel series. Director of photography Bill Pope, who worked on Darkman and the last two Spider-Mans, among others, keeps Scott’s world on the fantastical side even when he’s not being the super-hero.

The plot and action revolve around Scott’s love life and his dreams. His latest girlfriend was a 17-year-old high-school girl named Knives Chau (Ellen Wong). Anna Kendrick (Up in the Air and the Twilight Saga) is excellent as Scott’s older sister who whips out her lines just as smartly and convincingly as she did in Up in the Air. She’s savvy, cool and collected. (I wish they had given her more to do in this film. Such a waste of an extreme talent).

Scott’s “new-new” girlfriend, Ramona, is sexy and mysterious – a Goodwill thrift-store shopper who changes the color of her hair every week. Winstead gives Ramona a splash of depth and intrigue.

Kieran Culkin plays Wallace Wells, Scott’s gay roommate. He’s excellent as the quiet, unassuming roommate and adds a lot to the zaniness of the movie.

The exes that Scott has to fight symbolize different genre satires. I’m not going to tell you about all of them because it will be more fun for you to meet them when you watch the movie. However, Jason Schwartzman and Fantastic Four’s Chris Evans are two of the best.

I know one thing: teenagers and young adults who love video games are going to love this heartwarming fantasy!

I liked this movie, The Sorcerer’s Apprentice. And the audience in my theater seemed to really like it. There was a lot of laughter. However, it’s getting a lot of bad reviews, but I think some people take pleasure in tearing a film apart instead of just enjoying the ride.  People are calling it a Harry Potter knockoff, but I disagree, although I guess I can see some similarities. I think it’s a fun, simple, charming film with great actors and lots of humor.  It doesn’t have the layers and nuances of Harry Potter, but it’s fun, nonetheless. It begins in the 8th century when Merlin chooses three sorcerers/disciples: Balthazar (Nicolas Cage), Horvath (Alfred Molina) and Veronica (Monica Bellucci). Horvath betrays them and decides to help the evil sorceress Morgana (Alice Krige) destroy the world by raising the corpses of the dead.

Merlin is killed, and Veronica absorbs the soul of Morgana into her own body as a way to save Balthalzar. Balthazar imprisons her inside a wooden doll called the grimhold. He also imprisons Balthazar there, and a few other evil sorcerers. Now, it’s up to Balthazar to find the “next Merlin” called the “Prime Merlinean” – someone who will be descended from Merlin. To do this, he will need to find  the one person who can wear Merlin’s special, magical ring. He waits over a thousand years before young Dave comes along in the year 2000. They meet in a weird antique store where Dave accidentally frees Horvath from the grimhold. Then, both Horvath and Balthazar get imprisoned together in a magic urn for 10 years.

Time travel to present day where both Horvath and Balthazar escape the magic urn and a geeky Dave (Jay Baruchel, She’s Out Of My League) starts training with Balthalzar. Dave doesn’t realize he, himself – a nerdy 20 year old physics whiz – is a powerful sorcerer himself known as the “Prime Merlinean” – the only one in the world who will be able to defeat the chief evildoer, Morgana le Fay. Merlin’s prophecy foretold that one day, this “Prime Merlinean” would rise up to defeat the forces of black magic – the evil sorcerer Horvath (Alfred Molina) and Morgana.

There are some hilarious moments in the film. Horvath has his own apprentice – a Las Vegas-style, narcissistic magician named Drake (Toby Kebbell). (I kept thinking Russell Brand would have been spot-on in this role, but Toby did an excellent job).

Dave (Baruchel) trains with Balthalzar and the two work together to save each other from Horvath.

Teresa Palmer plays Becky, the beautiful blonde, blue-eyed, college student who Dave is in love with and has been since he was a child. The two do not have any chemistry, unfortunately. At all.  Dave (Baruchel) is simply not exactly right for this film, although he’s not bad. And, I would have liked it if Nicolas Cage had washed his hair. It was scraggly and greasy looking. Cage could have given his character a little more class with clean hair. After all, Molina gave his own character, Horvath, a very clean-cut, dressed up look.

The rest of the movie is a race for the grimhold and then a race to save the world. The best scenes are those between Cage and Baruchel; Cage is excellent going between stoic and nutty. He offers some funny lines such as dropping a line about getting some “itch cream” for the neurotic Dave in front of Becky. 

The movie was directed by Jon Turteltaub (the National Treasure films), and he does a good job moving the movie along at a fast pace.  There are plenty of cool special effects and action scenes that guys will love and girls will enjoy the love connection.

Honestly, this is a fun movie that tweens will really love – along with some adults who can just enjoy it for the entertainment factor. Don’t think too hard about it. This movie is just for fun.

W.O.W. (Which stands for Way Over Wow!) This movie is absolutely brilliant. In a nutshell, it explores the dream world and shows us how we can control our dreams. How we can go into our dreams, share our dreams with others and have adventures, even to the point of altering a person’s mind and his/her decisions in the waking world. Inception is simply incredible. Just like James Cameron created a new fantasy world in Avatar that was a unique visual masterpiece, Christopher Nolan (writer and director) created a dream world that’s unlike anything you’ve ever seen before on the big screen.

As you know, movies today generally are all action, chick flicks, sequels, remakes or franchises. In fact, it’s hard to find a movie that’s the “first of its kind.” A movie that introduces us to something we’ve never seen before. And that’s what Inception does.

Many of you will want to see this movie more than once because it’s a mind trip, to say the least. I heard several people around me in the theater say that they will have to go and see it again to understand it. That’s O.K. I think it will be even more exciting the second time because you can grasp it more fully.

Ah…the dream worlds. Freud believed that dreams were compounded out of the primal matter of the unconscious and the prosaic events of daily life. But, what if the dream world is actually our real world and this waking world nothing but a dream world? This question is posited to us several times in the movie.

Like Cobb, (Leonardo DiCaprio), the hero of that film, we, as the viewer of Inception is adrift in time and experience. We can never even be quite sure what the relationship between dream time and real time is. The hero explains that you can never remember the beginning of a dream, and that dreams that seem to cover hours may only last a short time. Yes, but you don’t know that when you’re dreaming. And what if you’re inside another man’s dream?

Dom Cobb (Leonardo DiCaprio) is an executive corporate raider – an extractor. He’s a skilled craftsman who can enter others’ dreams to draw out valuable information. In other words, he infiltrates the minds of others to steal their ideas. In Inception, he is hired by a powerful billionaire to do the opposite: To introduce an idea into a rival’s mind, and do it so well he believes it is his own. This has never been done before; our minds are as alert to foreign ideas as our immune system is to pathogens. The rich man, named Saito (Ken Watanabe), makes him an offer he can’t refuse, an offer that would end Cobb’s forced exile from home and family. We’re not sure exactly why Cobb can’t go back home to the U.S. where his two children are living with their grandmother. It’s only as the movie progresses do we learn the truth of the matter.

Cobb assembles a team. We meet the people he will need to work with: Arthur (Joseph Gordon-Levitt), his longtime associate; Eames (Tom Hardy), a master at deception; Yusuf (Dileep Rao), a master chemist. And there is a new recruit, Ariadne (Ellen Page), a brilliant young architect who is a prodigy at creating spaces. Cobb hires her to be the architect of the dream world. Cobb also touches base with his father-in-law Miles (Michael Caine), who knows what he does and how he does it.

We have to wonder why Cobb needs an architect to create spaces in dreams when he is the expert. He explains to Ariadne that dreams have a shifting architecture, as we all know and where we are has a way of changing and shifting. Cobb tutors Ariadne on the world of dream infiltration, the art of controlling dreams and navigating them.

Cobb’s assignment is the inception – the creation/birth –  of a new idea in the mind of another young billionaire, Robert Fischer Jr. (Cillian Murphy) heir to his father’s empire. Saito wants him to initiate ideas that will lead to the surrender of his rival’s corporation. To do this, Cobb and his team have to go deep, deep into the dream world – several layers deep, in fact. Cobb needs Ariadne to create a deceptive maze-space in Fischer’s dreams so they can implant new thoughts without him knowing. But, there are numerous dangers to invading other people’s dreams and there are different levels of dreaming, including dreams within dreams.

The reason Cobb is motivated to risk the dangers of inception is because of grief and guilt involving his wife Mal (the beautiful Marion Cotillard) who starred in La Vie en Rose), and their two children. I am not going to give the plot away because it’s better for you to discover this on your own.  Suffice it to say that Mal is not actually a player or character in the dream world created by Cobb; rather, she lives in the subconscious of Cobb’s mind and shows up in his dreams as a projection.

The special effects in this movie are absolutely astonishing. Breathtaking. On-the-edge-of-your-seat enthralling. (This movie would have been wonderful in 3-D and is on IMAX). The movie is a perplexing labyrinth and is sure to inspire endless analysis on the web. For example: Nolan folds a mirror version of Paris back upon itself; he stages a fight sequence in a gravity-free hotel room where everyone is floating and suspended in air; he sends a train plowing through a busy city street. Whatever you can dream, Nolan does it in Inception. Then he nestles those little dreams into even bigger dreams, and those bigger dreams into gargantuan dreams, going on into infinity, cubed. He stretches the boundaries of filmmaking so that it’s, like, not even filmmaking anymore – it’s an adventure that we’ve never experienced before.  

It is said that Christopher Nolan spent ten years writing his screenplay for Inception. (James Cameron spent about 15 years writing Avatar).  Einstein said that imagination is more important than knowledge. Christopher Nolan has tapped into his imaginative core to produce something that has stretched the boundaries of our mind. No doubt he has studied dreams in his own life to be able to construct something of this magnitude.

The entire cast is superb. Joseph Gordon-Levitt, who generally stars in comedic roles, is brilliant as his associate, Arthur.   

This movie is absolutely wonderful. It is original, thought-provoking, entertaining and suspenseful. The action scenes will take your breath away; the dream worlds will fascinate you and entertain you; the emotional landscape will tear at your core and you’ll leave the theater knowing you just experienced something that is brilliant and different. 

Go see this movie now!

Note:  Is it a coincidence that Ariadne is named for the woman in Greek mythology who helped Theseus escape from the Minotaur’s labyrinth?

Oh. My. Gosh. This movie is F.A.N.T.A.S.T.I.C. 

Congratulations to David Slade, director of the Twilight Saga: Eclipse movie. Congratulations to Rob Pattinson, Kristen Stewart and Taylor Lautner for giving us incredible performances. Congratulations to everyone who made this movie. The three leads excel under Slade’s direction. Stewart has greatly improved in her portrayal of Bella. In fact, her last monologue in the movie is touching and Academy-Award nomination worthy. Rob is so romantic, it will make every girl swoon with just the “thought” of having a boyfriend like him, and will make men everywhere take notes. And Taylor Lautner is absolutely brilliant in his role as Jacob – the fiery, spitfire friend who believes he can give Bella a better life than Edward.

Honestly though, I attribute a lot of the brilliance of this movie to director David Slade, the guy who gave us the better-than-average chiller 30 Days of Night and the equally better-than-average chiller, Hard Candy, featuring a pre-Juno Ellen Page as a teenager who teaches a pedophile some hard lessons. Previous directors Catherine Hardwicke on Twilight and Chris Weitz on New Moon each had a different style — the former quite indie and romantic, and the latter forced to deal with a “missing Edward” for most of the movie, which fans didn’t like.

Slade knows how to create a fast pace that’s heightened with tension and he used that talent in Eclipse. From the mysterious, tension-filled opening scene to the edge-of-your-seat, nail-biting finale, the movie is equal parts action fantasy, romance, drama and comedy. The jealousy, humor and sparring between Jacob (Taylor Lautner) and Edward (Rob Pattinson) are some of my favorite moments in the movie. Eclipse easily moves into the heart of the matter – a love triangle that forces Bella (Kristen Stewart) to face the fact that she’s in love with 2 young men in her life – Jacob and Edward. Of course, those who have read the book know who she ultimately chooses; they know what will happen. I’m aware there are those of you out there who are watching the movies and not reading the books. You’re missing a lot. There are so many nuances and stories in the book that can’t be included in the movies. Just like the Harry Potter books and movies. If you’re not reading the books, you’re missing a lot of the story. Still, Eclipse is one movie you’ll love no matter if you’ve read the book or not.

Xavier Samuel

The film starts with a scene that introduces the storyline of a serial killer in Seattle. It appears that there is a series of vicious killings and disappearances in Seattle. This tips off the Cullen clan that a vampire is creating an army of newborns – newly turned vampires whose ravenous thirst makes them stronger and more deadly than “old” vampires. Xavier Samuel stars as Riley, one of the newborns who is leading this army. And, wow, is he gorgeous. Xavier is likely to become the new “hottie” of this movie. (I’m sure Rob and Taylor won’t mind moving over to let someone else take on the fans!) Xavier revealed that he read the series after being cast as “Riley” and became a fan, finding the stories “intoxicating” and being left “not surprised that they’ve generated this kind of support.” From Hamilton, Victoria, Australia, Xavier attended Flinders University Drama Centre in 2005 where he played Hamlet in the graduate production. And, he graduated from Rostrevor College in Australia in 2001. I’m sure we’ll see much more of him in American films.

There is the classic reintroduction of the movie’s main characters: Bella Swan (Kristen Stewart) who is still in love with Edward and still insistent on becoming a vampire, but resistant about the idea of marriage; beautiful Edward Cullen (Robert Pattinson), who will do anything for Bella EXCEPT sleep with her. He explains he believes in getting married before having sex, and Jacob Black (Taylor Lautner), a hunky six-pack, constantly bare-chested Native American who shape-shifts into a wolf at a moment’s notice. As Edward says in the movie, “Doesn’t he own a shirt?” The script by Melissa Rosenberg offers more humor in this film than in the others. Another favorite scene of mine is in the tent when Edward allows Jacob to sleep in the sleeping bag with Bella as a way to keep her warm. Jacob tells Edward, “I’m way hotter than you.” Hilarious.

Bryce Dallas Howard on set with Xavier Samuel (Victoria & Riley)

The red-headed villain, Victoria, is played by Bryce Dallas Howard, who, in seeking revenge against the Cullens and Edward in particular, intends to destroy Bella with this newborn army of vampires. This prompts Edward and Jacob to contemplate the unthinkable – a temporary alliance to protect the girl they both love. Bryce Dallas Howard is the daughter to Ron Howard, a former actor turned Oscar-winning director. Bryce has said in interviews that she is a Twi-hard and watched the first movie, Twilight, numerous times. She said she was afraid to wrestle with Edward (Rob) in the film, worried she would hurt him. Bryce replaced Rachelle Lefevre as Victoria due to alleged filming conflicts.

Billy Burke returns as Charlie, Bella’s father and police chief, and once again, he steals every scene he’s in. Bella and Charlie have a talk about sex that is priceless. The series’ more peripheral characters are better portrayed in this film. The film delivers back-stories for both Jasper (Jackson Rathbone) and Rosalie (Nikki Reed) of the Cullen family as well as the origins of Jacob’s family, the wolf pack, without any of these flashbacks seeming like intrusions.

Several members of the Volturi make an appearance and with Dakota Fanning as the cunning Jane, are just as spooky as ever.

As for the wolf pack, the CG wolves – huge, believable creatures whose ferocity fails to mask their tenderness – are very cool, and the fight at the climax among wolves, vampires and one poor human is no letdown. Again, thank you, David Slade!  

Paul Denham Austerberry did a fantastic job as production designer, taking advantage of the beautiful dark woods of British Columbia. Director of photography is Javier Aguirresarobe and this movie features some of the most beautiful scenes – wide-swept fields and mountains in addition to a snowy wonderland.

Howard Shore scored the movie and it is lush and beautiful. (He also scored the Lord of the Rings trilogy.) I loved that Clair de lune was playing in the background at Edward’s house – a wonderful reference to the first movie, Twilight.

I’m not going to write in-depth about the plot. There’s no need to because I am sure all of you fans know the plot. I will say this: The Twilight Saga: Eclipse is the best of all the Twilight movies so far. I’ve already seen it twice and I plan to go and see it again tomorrow. I can’t think of a better way to spend my Sunday than to spend some time with Edward and Jacob.

Update on Box Office Numbers

According to www.metro.co.uk, The Twilight Saga: Eclipse is on course for a $200 million opening. Summit Entertainment said it took in more than $120 million (£79 million) during its first three days of release. This is the first Twilight film to be released in a large screen format for presentation on IMAX screens.

The distributor also published a prediction which suggested the film would enjoy total ticket sales worth almost $200 million in its opening six days.

Should that prove to be the case, The Twilight Saga: Eclipse would beat the opening-week box office figures of its two predecessors. It would also make it third in the all-time opening six-day figures chart, behind The Dark Knight and Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen. The Twilight Saga: Eclipse has already set several sales records, including the best midnight gross figure of $30 million, according to Hollywood.com Box Office. However, it only had the second biggest first-day sales, as its $65.8 million was well short of The Twilight Saga: New Moon’s record of $72.7 million from 4,024 theaters on its opening day, setting a new all-time single day box office record. That figure included $26.3M in midnight shows. On Wednesday, June 30, 2004, Spider-Man 2 took in $40.4M ($52M adjusted for inflation). By the end of the Monday holiday it had taken in $180.1M (230M adjusted).

The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn

Producer Wyck Godfry recently confirmed that The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn, a two-part film will be shot in Louisiana as well as back up in Vancouver. Melissa Rosenberg, the screenwriter, says that Breaking Dawn will be sexier. She’s aware of fans’ petitions to make the two flicks R-rated, thanks to a certain feathers flying Edward and Bella sex scene. She says, “I think we can get awfully sexy with a PG-13. I’m not worried about the rating. I know a lot of fans are like, ‘We have to go R to do it justice,’ but I don’t think so. I think it’s going to be pretty hot. Way hot!”

Note: All photos are courtesy of Summit Entertainment.

I really enjoyed this movie, Knight and Day. Starring Tom Cruise, Cameron Diaz, Peter Sarsgaard, Viola Davis, Paul Dano, Maggie Grace, and Marc Blucas, this movie is charming, sweet, and action-oriented. It doesn’t hurt that Cruise wields a nice 6-pack, too. (Move over, Taylor Lautner!)

I have to admit: I get tired of the overdone movie plot in which an American guy gets tangled up in an espionage, hit men and CIA ops. They seldom have much of a plot and are all action. Knight and Day is a refreshing change. It has plenty of action, lots of humor and enough romance to satisfy women and not get on men’s nerves.

June Havens (Cameron Diaz) catches the wrong flight back to Boston which intertwines her with a handsome, mysterious and slightly comedic secret agent (Tom Cruise). He bumps into her seemingly by mistake, they exchange pleasantries and part ways only to bump into each other again before boarding a plane. Cruise plays Roy Miller, an alleged rogue secret super-assassin CIA agent. He isn’t happy about June boarding his plane. Turns out the plane is almost empty, apparently it was booked up by the government except for a few passengers. June, a tomboy who owns an auto repair shop, sits near Roy, thinks he is handsome and decides to go for it. She heads off to the bathroom to freshen up and while she’s gone major mayhem ensues between Roy and the other men on the plane. When she returns, she throws herself at him and it takes her a while to figure out just what exactly happened while she was in the bathroom.

Then, the action and fun really takes off. Once June is back in Boston, she meets a good friend of hers and tells him about this “strange guy” she met on the plane. Roy appears just at that time and says, “I’m that guy,” which is indeed one of Cruise’s funniest lines.

Roy is sweet and charming to June, warning her that some people from the government might come looking for her and if they do, she is not to trust them. Never get in a vehicle with them, he says, and the more they tell you that they’re taking you to a secure location where you’ll be safe, the more you can be certain that they’re going to kill you.

There’s some spy-stuff stuff afoot with Roy being watched by some guys who seem to be government agents. With a lot of slick action sequences and impossible “mission impossible” stunts and other traditional 007 accoutrements including gun battles, exotic locales – from a South Pacific island to the streets of Seville – twists and turns, and car chases, the story moves at a fast pace.

Cruise is great in this role. He’s what we want an action hero to be – handsome, charming, kind, sweet, debonair…and did I mention that 6-pack? It’s great seeing him in this sort of role once again. Cruise is perfect in his portrayal of a trained killer on the run from the government. This is an action-romance comedy at heart and Cruise creates a character that, while he’s 100% tough, there is some “tongue in cheek” comedy as if he’s winking at us during some of the scenes. It’s fun and refreshing. Cameron Diaz is funny and adorable, as always. She plays the wide-eyed innocent who is slowly enlightened about who the good guys and bad guys are.

Meanwhile, Peter Sarsgaard plays the heavy, Roy’s intra-agency rival, with Viola Davis as their boss. I am not going to give the plot away. I hate it when reviewers do that. It kind of spoils the movie for me. I’m going to let you go see the film and enjoy the ride.

Directed by James Mangold and written by Mangold and Patrick O’Neill, I think it’s the perfect date night movie for any age.

Go have some fun!

All photos are courtesy of New Regency Pictures and Twentieth Century Fox.

I love this movie. Many critics are slamming it, but I don’t understand why. What’s not to love? Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time, is based off of the famous video games that have sold millions of copies.

Prince of Persia shouldn’t be compared with horrible movies based on video games, like Doom or Final Fantasy. Instead, it should be compared to a movie like Pirates of Caribbean, although I think it’s much better, to tell you the truth. It is beautiful, dreamy, romantic and yet filled with plenty of action, Arabian warriors, heroics, and fantasy.  And, it stays true to the video game.

Jake Gyllenhaal (Brothers, Brothers, Brokeback Mountain, Zodiac) plays lead character, Dastan, who is a street urchin-pickpocket who was noticed by the King of Persia, who adopted him and turned him into a Persian Prince. Gyllenhaal bulked up for the role and he looks quite handsome as he leaps and dances on rooftops and fences, then pulling himself up on windowsills and flying through the air. (For the record, Gyllenhaal did all his own stunts.) Gyllenhaal has a lot of charisma and charm in this movie.

Sharing the spotlight with two brothers, Dastan has become quite good at fighting, and has even been placed in charge of his own group of men. They take the king’s men to invade a nearby city – a holy city, no less – because their uncle Nizam (Ben Kingsley), has acquired evidence that this ancient outpost is manufacturing and providing weapons to Persia’s enemies. But even as they invade and capture this supposedly holy city, evidence emerges that, in fact, the uncle’s intelligence was false.

While trying to take down this neighboring holy kingdom that is said to have been ferrying weapons to their enemies, Dastan comes face to face with an unlikely woman – a beautiful woman – who will cause him to question everything about his past and future. This woman is played by Gemma Arterton (Clash of Titans, Quantum of Solace). She is Princess Tamina, the beautiful princess of the holy kingdom which is revered and “sacred.” She protects something mysterious and “sacred” within this city. 

Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time is at its best when Dastan is using a special dagger to travel through time. Ben Kingsley plays Dastan’s uncle and Alfred Molina is wonderful as an entrepreneur who travels with a band of thieves.

When Dastan is framed for the death of his father, he must find a way to clear his name. In doing so, he discovers that there were sinister motives to attacking that “sacred” city. The questions that surround Dastan include how he might survive and whether he will wind up with the princess of the neighboring city that he has helped attack.

I will stop here at this point. I don’t want to give away too much of the plot of this movie. It’s fun and surprising and beautiful. Filmed in Morroco, the scenery is lush and exotic, comprised of moonscape desert sands. And the costumes and special effects are breathtaking.

Produced by Jerry Bruckheimer, Mike Newell is the director of Prince of Persia: Boaz Yakin and Doug Miro wrote the script.

I recommend that you go to the theater, get a bag of popcorn and thoroughly enjoy this fantasy film. It is quite wonderful!

Oh. My. Gosh. This movie is wonderful. I was swept away from the first few moments into a world in 12th century England and I loved every moment of it. No one does this time period better than Russell Crowe. He is brilliant in his role as Robin Hood. Ridley Scott gave us the outstanding films, Gladiator and Kingdom of Heaven, which were superb. Now he gives us Robin Hood. I know many critics slammed Ridley’s new movie Robin Hood because it departs from the usual myths, but this is one reason I loved it so much. Instead, it adopts a narrative that comports very well with the historical narratives that have been discussed regarding English Liberalism and French Conservatism. The NY Times review of the movie offers this amusing take:

You may have heard that Robin Hood stole from the rich and gave to the poor, but that was just liberal media propaganda. This Robin is no socialist bandit practicing freelance wealth redistribution, but rather a manly Libertarian rebel striking out against high taxes and a big government scheme to trample the ancient liberties of property owners and provincial nobles. Don’t tread on him!

I totally agree. Set in 12th Century England, Robin Hood represents a common plea amongst citizens. Lower the taxes! His stand for the common man rings true today as it did in the 12th century.

If you don’t know a lot about the French and English history of the 12th century, you might get a bit lost in this movie. For historian buffs, I think they’ll love it. For me, it didn’t matter. The movie is simply wonderful whether you know the history or not. Filmed in England and France, the scenery is lush. The movie chronicles the adventures of Robin Longstride (Russell Crowe), a common archer in the army of King Richard the Lionheart (Danny Huston) during his 10-year Crusade to the Holy Land. With his Crusade over and his army badly demoralized, Richard is headed back home, sacking every French castle they cross to fund their retreat. After Lionheart is killed in battle, Robin and his group of men decide that 10 years is more than enough service to the Crown, and ditches the army for home. On their way back to England, they run across a French ambush led by the duplicitous Englishman Godfrey (Mark Strong), and the badly injured Sir Robert Loxley. Despite his better judgment, Robin agrees to take the dying Knight’s sword home to his father.

Meanwhile, back in England, Prince John (Oscar Isaac), the next in line to the throne, greets news of his brother Richard’s death. He immediately assigns Godfrey, unaware of the man’s treachery, to begin collecting owed taxes by any means necessary. Godfrey does this by bringing over French raiders to sack English towns, quickly turning the country’s Lords against their new King.

Robin arrives in Nottingham, where he delivers the sad news to Sir Walter Loxley (Max von Sydow) and Robert’s beautiful and suffering wife, Marion (Cate Blanchett), who only knew her husband for one week before he went off to the Crusade. Here, the kindly Lord makes Robin a deal he can’t refuse: pretend to be the dead Robert, so that Marion will retain their possessions once Walter passes. Robin agrees.

The story is very romantic and focuses on the “common man,” Robin, falling in love with the Lady Marion, who slowly but surely comes to accept him as a replacement husband and falls in love, as well. Marion Loxley was originally supposed to be played by the much younger Sienna Miller, but its director Ridley Scott’s good luck (as well as the audience’s) that Miller, for whatever reason, was replaced by Cate Blanchett, who is brilliant in the role. The much more mature actress brings instant credibility to the burgeoning love story between Robin and Marion, a necessity given that it takes up nearly an hour of the film’s two-hour plus running time. Eventually, though, Prince John’s stupidity and Godfrey’s French sucking comes to center stage, as the English must put aside their differences to battle the invading French forces.

Of the supporting cast, Max von Sydow is wonderful as a man who knows more about Robin than he does. Matthew Macfadyen, as the sleazy Sheriff of Nottingham, is appropriately sleazy and unlikeable. Robin Hood’s merry men get loud and rambunctious and add humor throughout the film. And Mark Addy as Friar Tuck is effective and fun, as well.

The film’s other major side character is William Hurt as William Marshal, a pivotal character who seems to know what’s going on at every time, and is satisfied to work in the background. Mark Strong, as the bad guy, is menacing as always in his “bad guy” roles. The movie never gives us a reason to understand his actions, save he’s the bad guy.

Robin Hood has a PG-13 rating. The battle scenes are not bloody at all and the violence is mild. It won’t offend anyone.

Scott has already said that he has envisioned a trilogy, and knows exactly where to take a sequel (or two) should Robin Hood’s box office prove fruitful. I hope it does because I’d love to see more of Robin Hood and Marion’s adventures.

An overview of the director and cast:

Director: …Ridley Scott/ Brian Helgeland, Ethan Reiff, Cyrus Voris (screenplay)
Cast: Russell Crowe … Robin Longstride
Cate Blanchett … Marion Loxley
Max von Sydow … Sir Walter Loxley
William Hurt … William Marshal
Mark Strong … Godfrey
Oscar Isaac … Prince John
Danny Huston … King Richard The Lionheart
Mark Addy … Friar Tuck
Matthew Macfadyen … Sheriff of Nottingham
Kevin Durand … Little John
Scott Grimes … Will Scarlet

Historical Note: Who was Robin Hood?

Robin Hood is portrayed in books, films and televisions programs as the fallen hero, a member of the nobility who was outcast and then fought back against tyranny. Yet this version of Robin Hood in the movie starring Russell Crowe is a relatively recent one and delving into history suggests that if Robin Hood did exist he was more likely a peasant or at best a small land owner.

As with any long-lived figure in the popular imagination — and the legend of the outlaw of Sherwood Forest and his Merry Men goes back to the Middle Ages — the answer changes with the times. In the movies he has been played most memorably by Errol Flynn, Kevin Costner, Clive Owen, and now by Russell Crowe. The history of the famous rebel suggests the version in Robin Hood films and books is a recent invention

Modern Robin Hood

The idea that Robin Hood was a member of the aristocracy can be traced back to 1598 and a play by Andrew Munday called: “The Downfall of and Death of Robert, Earl of Huntingdon.”
As the April 2010 Robin Hood special issue of Nottingham Arrow says: “In the 16th century, Robin was given a leg up the social ladder when poets and playwrights turned him from an ordinary man to a fallen nobleman – either Robert Fitzooth (Earl of Huntingdon) or Robert of Loxley.”

This gentrification of Robin Hood continued and in 1795, William Stukeley, a fellow of the Royal Society, made up a noble pedigree for Robin Hood and it is this fiction that is now repeated regularly in modern Robin Hood films and books.

Old Robin Hood

Historian Judy Cox has traced early references to Robin Hood in ballads written in the 1400s in which can be found the archery contests, clever disguises, daring rescues and fighting evil sheriffs that are the staple diet of modern television and film versions of Robin Hood.